Home / Clinical Guideline Hubs / Chapter 16.4
Section 16 — Ethics & Professionalism Educational reference v1.0 · July 2026

Chapter 16.4 — Informed Consent, Assent & Surrogate Decision-Making

Getting permission right when the patient can't give it · An educational reference

Educational reference. Consent processes and exceptions vary by jurisdiction — follow institutional policy and legal counsel.
QUICK-REFERENCE BOX — The Language and the Rules

1. Overview

The Core Idea

Valid informed consent requires disclosure, understanding, voluntariness, and capacity. Because young children — and certainly neonates — lack the capacity to consent, clinicians obtain parental permission and, for older children, assent. Neonatal care relies on parents as surrogate decision-makers acting in the infant's best interest.

2. The Four Elements of Consent

ElementMeaning
DisclosureAdequate information on risks, benefits, and alternatives
UnderstandingThe decision-maker comprehends that information
VoluntarinessThe decision is free of coercion or undue influence
CapacityThe decision-maker can reason and make the decision

3. Parental Permission vs Assent

Getting the Terms Right
  • Parental permission: what parents/guardians give for a child's care.
  • Assent: a developmentally appropriate child's agreement — sought when the child is old enough, but a neonate cannot assent.
  • For neonates, decisions are made by parents under the best-interest standard.

4. Exceptions to Consent

When You May Act Without It
  • Emergency exception: life-saving treatment may be given without prior consent when delay would cause serious harm.
  • Consent is presumed in a true emergency for a treatment a reasonable person would want.

5. Limits of Parental Authority & Mandatory Reporting

When the Team Must Act
  • Parental refusal of clearly life-saving, low-burden treatment that would seriously harm the infant may warrant ethics consultation or legal/child-protective involvement.
  • Suspected child abuse or neglect must be reported; this mandatory reporting overrides confidentiality.
  • Confidentiality and "therapeutic privilege" have limits and do not justify withholding safety-relevant action.

6. Documentation

Record the Conversation

Document what was disclosed (risks, benefits, alternatives), who was present, the questions raised, and the decision reached. Good documentation protects the family, the team, and the shared plan.

7. Key Pearls

High-Value Points
  • Consent = disclosure + understanding + voluntariness + capacity.
  • Pediatrics uses parental permission + assent, not the child's "consent."
  • Neonates can't assent; parents decide on best interests.
  • Emergency exception allows life-saving treatment without prior consent.
  • Mandatory reporting of abuse/neglect overrides confidentiality.

8. Common Mistakes to Avoid

Misreadings & Better Practice

Frequent errors around consent.

MistakeWhy it's wrongBetter practice
Saying a child "consents."Wrong term.Parental permission + child assent.
Delaying emergency care to chase consent.Serious harm from delay.Use the emergency exception.
Treating parental authority as unlimited.Bounded by harm to the child.Escalate/report when required.

9. High-Yield Summary

Key Takeaways
  • Consent elements: disclosure, understanding, voluntariness, capacity.
  • Pediatrics: parental permission + assent; neonates → best-interest surrogate decisions.
  • Emergency exception permits life-saving treatment without prior consent.
  • Parental authority is limited; abuse/neglect reporting overrides confidentiality.
  • Document the consent conversation.

10. References

Back to Clinical Guideline Hubs